I firmly agree with Andrew that young children should not be allowed to play video game, whether they are meant for educational purposes or not. While Andrew's reasons regarding traditional education and parents-children interaction are also valid, my primary concern focuses on the potential Internet addiction.
While Kelly makes a valid points that computers and information technologies are crucial these days, I believe she overlook the potential damage of these new techonologies. Students are spending hours scrolling Twitter, playing video games or watching Youtube videos, jeopardizing their academic performance and future development.
Children as young as 2-8 years old lacks the discipline to resist the temptation and glamour of video games. While the purpose of those games might be educational, they will inevitably open the gate of the online world to young children who are not yet prepared for such practices.
In conclusion, I believe children should not be exposed to video games in an effort to prevent addiction.
Gemini老师修改之后的范文
I firmly agree with Andrew that young children, especially those aged between 2-8, should not be exposed to computer games, even educational ones.
While Kelly makes a valid point that digital literacy is essential in modern society, I believe she overlooks the potential risks of introducing screens too early. My primary concern is the impact on a child’s developing brain and attention span. Video games utilize high-stimulation rewards, which can be incredibly addictive.
Specifically, young children lack the self-discipline to regulate their screen time. If they become accustomed/conditioned to the game-like learning style, they may find traditional learning methods boring and under-stimulating in comparison. Therefore, protecting their ability to focus on slow-reality is more important than early tech skills.
